Advocates of the Tea Party movement would MOST likely support which type of government?

The Tea Party movement is primarily associated with a strong emphasis on limited government, individual liberties, and states' rights. Advocates of this movement often express skepticism towards federal authority and comprehensive governmental involvement in citizens' lives. A confederation, which is a system where multiple sovereign states come together for joint action while retaining their independence and autonomy, aligns well with the Tea Party's ideology of minimizing central governmental control and promoting greater power at the state level. This preference reflects a foundational belief in decentralized governance, which is a core tenet of the Tea Party's political philosophy.

In contrast, a unitary system centralizes power within a single national government, which the Tea Party would likely oppose due to its focus on reducing federal influence. Communitarianism prioritizes community and societal good, often advocating for a level of government intervention, which does not align with the Tea Party's focus on individualism and limited government. A federal system, while it does allocate powers between national and state governments, can still involve significant federal oversight, which may not fully resonate with the Tea Party's goal of limiting central authority and promoting state-level governance. Each of these alternatives differs significantly in structure and principles from the confederation model that the Tea Party movement would most likely endorse