The principle of prior restraint, established in Near v. Minnesota, is associated with which right?

The principle of prior restraint, as established in the landmark Supreme Court case Near v. Minnesota, is directly associated with the right to freedom of speech. Prior restraint refers to governmental actions that prevent speech or other expressions before they occur, rather than regulating or punishing them after the fact. In Near v. Minnesota, the Court ruled that state laws imposing prior restraint on publications are unconstitutional under the First Amendment.

This ruling reaffirmed that freedom of speech is not just about what can be said but also entails a protection against undue censorship by the government before speech is expressed. This landmark decision set a significant precedent in First Amendment jurisprudence, emphasizing the vital role of a free press and the need to protect this freedom from governmental interference. Other rights listed, such as the right to privacy, freedom of religion, and the right to bear arms, do not pertain to the concept of prior restraint in the same context and are governed by different legal precedents and interpretations.