What was Federalists' stance on the Bill of Rights?

The Federalists, who were proponents of the new Constitution, believed that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary because they felt that the Constitution itself provided sufficient protections for individual liberties. Their argument was that by enumerating specific rights, it might imply that any unlisted rights were not protected, which could lead to a limitation of freedoms. They trusted that the system of checks and balances established within the Constitution, along with the separation of powers, would safeguard the rights of citizens effectively. Therefore, they did not see a need for additional amendments that explicitly outlined these rights. This perspective was rooted in their confidence in the new governmental framework and its ability to prevent tyranny, contrasting with the concerns of the Anti-Federalists who supported a Bill of Rights to ensure specific protections for individual liberties against potential government infringement.